|
Why dedicating a site to Oriana Fallaci?
Was there any need to?
Yes, we felt the need, it is the only way we have to
thank her to have opened our eyes.
Because she has the uncountable merit to have shaken the
consciences, to have called things with their proper names, to have torn
the veil of Maya which covered opportunistic conveniences, “omertosi”
silences, guilty faults.
Because she had the immense courage to put herself
against everyone, even at the risk of her life.
Because she had the merit to claim stubbornly
constitutionally guaranteed right to express one’s opinion.
Because she had the moral firmness of continuously
appealing to the force of reason.
To her reasonings, built on facts, names, surnames,
dates, her detractors have opposed generic, absurd and libellous
accusations of xenophobia and racism, without ever facing the problems,
with the clear intent to hiss her, intimidate her, isolate her.
We know very well that one can love or hate her, that she
stirs up strong emotions, that she doesn’t leave us cold, we know very
well that her narrative style is cutting, whipping, hard, sometimes
irreverent and even haughty, we know very well that she has attracted
the discords of politically correct intellectuals, of the right-thinking
persons, of the chatter boxes, of the “collaborazionisti”, besides, of
course, of the Islamic absolutists.
We know very well that she has not any political
referents and, on the contrary, almost always, she is avoided by these
ones, being too awkward, too insensible to the flatteries of the
parties, too inadequate to the convenient compromises.
We can but agree with her when she affirms that the
moderate Islam doesn’t exist (at least at the actual state of things),
that it is an idea invented by us, the western people, there exist some
muslims, who must be supported, intellectuals, writers, artists, almost
always exiled into western countries and almost always considered as
traitors and apostate by their same compatriots.
We can but agree with her when she puts bluntly the
guilty ineptitude of the political forces to deal the Islamic phenomenon
and, in general, the clandestine immigrations, an insipid “melassa” made
of “buonismo”, docility, approximation, “multiculturalismo” elevated to
ideological dignity whose results are in front of all the eyes.
If we grant more and more, we will not obtain to pacify
them and to make them loyal to our Constitution, if we renounce to part
of our values and our traditions, they will not do the same, if we
permit a sort of legality parallel to ours, a kind of state inside the
State, we will not do a favour to those Islamic who call themselves
moderate.
And while Troy burns, what to do? This site wants to be
an answer for all those consciences who, reading her books, have asked
themselves: what to do?
We would like to give voice to these consciences.
What moves us is not the wish to be against something,
but in favour of: in favour of our culture and of our identity, but in
order to do this, we need your support.
Troy is burning, but there is still the possibility to
extinguish the fire, but we must do it soon, at once, before it is too
late. Help us!
|